???
Unknown Token
SRswG5…hc3gVerifying token — refresh in a moment.
Unknown Token
SRswG5…hc3gVerifying token — refresh in a moment.
Map the top holders as linked-entity clusters — CEX, LP, burn and dev wallets labeled, with a supply-concentration score.
Get a plain-English answer from live on-chain data.
| Time | Side | USD | Tx |
|---|---|---|---|
| sell | $0.246573 | 4shy11az…FfJN | |
| sell | $0.58988 | 2EnL2kw6…yr9P | |
| sell | $0.265602 | 4dVex8an…dTXm | |
| buy | $0.370023 | 2zF9tAMg…zR8J | |
| buy | $1.27 | 3oZzZCxA…GX5i |
· 4 clusters found, top one controls 0.00% of supply (4 via daisy-chain funding).
· 1 relay wallet detected in funding chains — operator likely tried to hide the source via pass-through hops.
· Amount-fingerprint match: 5 holders first-funded with 0.002 SOL ±5% despite using different intermediate funders.
· 1 of 30 top holders funded from a known CEX (organic).
· Tight funding burst detected — ≥1 cluster was funded within 5 minutes.
· 2 holders had no on-chain funding history we could read (may be very new or use ZK).
Detection layers (any one of which flags a cluster): (1) shared immediate funder; (2) shared deepest-ancestor across multi-hop daisy chains; (3) pass-through relay hops in the chain; (4) near-identical first-fund amounts (±5%) across different funders; (5) wallet-age cohorts first funded within 1h of each other. CEX-funded holders are treated as organic. Scan covers top 30 holders, chains depth-limited to 4. Max chain depth observed: 4 · relay hops detected: 1.