Unknown Token
EgXfZc…mTTgVerifying token — refresh in a moment.
Map the top holders as linked-entity clusters — CEX, LP, burn and dev wallets labeled, with a supply-concentration score.
Get a plain-English answer from live on-chain data.
| Time | Side | USD | Tx |
|---|---|---|---|
| sell | $1.59 | 126XMsPC…yGZH | |
| sell | $1.05K | 5avbUmX6…zh8G | |
| sell | $1.10 | 52dwD9rP…w5JQ | |
| buy | $1.04K | 3NF7RMXR…rghh | |
| buy | $5.00 | XUyP2tXQ…EDFg | |
| buy | $0.11144 | 3TDCpEHm…cqbw | |
| sell | $0.00e+0 | sZEXbvGm…tjyo |
· No coordinated funding patterns detected in top holders.
· 2 relay wallets detected in funding chains — operator likely tried to hide the source via pass-through hops.
· Amount-fingerprint match: 5 holders first-funded with 0.002 SOL ±5% despite using different intermediate funders.
· 3 top holders first appeared on-chain within 14m of each other.
· 4 holders had no on-chain funding history we could read (may be very new or use ZK).
Detection layers (any one of which flags a cluster): (1) shared immediate funder; (2) shared deepest-ancestor across multi-hop daisy chains; (3) pass-through relay hops in the chain; (4) near-identical first-fund amounts (±5%) across different funders; (5) wallet-age cohorts first funded within 1h of each other. CEX-funded holders are treated as organic. Scan covers top 27 holders, chains depth-limited to 4. Max chain depth observed: 4 · relay hops detected: 2.