???
Unknown Token
Name & links are creator-provided and unverified.
CCD7qB…YsxLCould not find token metadata. Might be a fake token or not indexed yet. Proceed with extreme caution!
Our scanner graded this token HIGH RISK.
Unknown Token
Name & links are creator-provided and unverified.
CCD7qB…YsxLCould not find token metadata. Might be a fake token or not indexed yet. Proceed with extreme caution!
Map the top holders as linked-entity clusters — CEX, LP, burn and dev wallets labeled, with a supply-concentration score.
Get a plain-English answer from live on-chain data.
| Time | Side | USD | Tx |
|---|---|---|---|
| sell | $0.00e+0 | 4MWSj46S…sM7s | |
| sell | $4.80 | 4w8vk9G7…BRvk | |
| buy | $4.80 | oYk88Vcv…eZkn | |
| buy | $2.00 | 3E1nDqbq…qen2 | |
| sell | $2.00 | 5Gco2Tcp…cF1b | |
| sell | $7.89K | 5twhRPRm…QP6E | |
| buy | $1.22K | 4DeMdQu6…CrPd | |
| buy | $6.67K | 3YRUD2cu…ubyN | |
| buy | $6.00 | 5JAY2Ru9…ujFd |
· 4 clusters found, top one controls 0.00% of supply (4 via daisy-chain funding).
· 4 relay wallets detected in funding chains — operator likely tried to hide the source via pass-through hops.
· Amount-fingerprint match: 3 holders first-funded with 0.002 SOL ±5% despite using different intermediate funders.
· Tight funding burst detected — ≥1 cluster was funded within 5 minutes.
· 1 holder had no on-chain funding history we could read (may be very new or use ZK).
Detection layers (any one of which flags a cluster): (1) shared immediate funder; (2) shared deepest-ancestor across multi-hop daisy chains; (3) pass-through relay hops in the chain; (4) near-identical first-fund amounts (±5%) across different funders; (5) wallet-age cohorts first funded within 1h of each other. CEX-funded holders are treated as organic. Scan covers top 30 holders, chains depth-limited to 4. Max chain depth observed: 4 · relay hops detected: 4.