???
Unknown Token
Name & links are creator-provided and unverified.
7XMitH…LxWhCould not find token metadata. Might be a fake token or not indexed yet. Proceed with extreme caution!
Our scanner graded this token HIGH RISK.
Unknown Token
Name & links are creator-provided and unverified.
7XMitH…LxWhCould not find token metadata. Might be a fake token or not indexed yet. Proceed with extreme caution!
Map the top holders as linked-entity clusters — CEX, LP, burn and dev wallets labeled, with a supply-concentration score.
Get a plain-English answer from live on-chain data.
| Time | Side | USD | Tx |
|---|---|---|---|
| sell | $1.05K | DYVvK6A9…jXzC | |
| sell | $0.980266 | PV8EjHcg…Rczp | |
| buy | $1.04K | 44qoruGX…nLme | |
| buy | $5.00 | 2it2yNFv…pfRt | |
| buy | $0.10945 | 4v3mpgfw…Zbqf | |
| sell | $0.00e+0 | 3uwBpgzx…Cxif |
· 1 cluster found, top one controls 36.00% of supply (1 via daisy-chain funding).
· 6 relay wallets detected in funding chains — operator likely tried to hide the source via pass-through hops.
· Amount-fingerprint match: 2 holders first-funded with 0.002 SOL ±5% despite using different intermediate funders.
· 2 top holders first appeared on-chain within 47m of each other.
· 1 of 20 top holders funded from a known CEX (organic).
Detection layers (any one of which flags a cluster): (1) shared immediate funder; (2) shared deepest-ancestor across multi-hop daisy chains; (3) pass-through relay hops in the chain; (4) near-identical first-fund amounts (±5%) across different funders; (5) wallet-age cohorts first funded within 1h of each other. CEX-funded holders are treated as organic. Scan covers top 20 holders, chains depth-limited to 4. Max chain depth observed: 4 · relay hops detected: 6.